The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - Off Topic

Re: NFL BullShiite

By Booger926
9/30/2017 3:55 pm
Ares wrote:
You're just upset and want to couch it in any possible way other than that you don't like black athletes taking a brief political stance before games.


In an organization that is 78% African American, HOW CAN YOU EVEN DARE BRINGING RACE INTO THE EQUATION?????

Gee, maybe one should sue the NFL because they don't meet National Guidelines of equal opportunity.

Just my "White Privilege" speaking out against percieved Racial Injustice.

When one has to pass a law saying 17% of the US population should have equal opportunity, why did there even have to be a law. One should be based on what they bring to the table instead of the color of their skin.


Care to reply?
Last edited at 9/30/2017 4:19 pm

Re: NFL BullShiite

By Ares
9/30/2017 4:48 pm
Booger926 wrote:

Dear Sir;
Although I respect your opinion, I wish you would respect mine.


You literally finish this by calling me a racist, so please, continue to self-righteously (and erroneously) claim the moral high ground.

Booger926 wrote:

Colin Kaepernick began the protest to bring attention to police brutality against Blacks. However, after opting out of a contract, by his choice mind you, and not being picked up by any team as a free agent, Colin then stated that he would now stand for the Anthem. Let me ask you this....Other than being unemployed, what has changed in 1 year? Basically, Kaepernick is a ***** chasing the money.

The current protests are in response to our elected President's opinions, which is also guaranteed under the right of Freedom of Speech. If the players / league wanted show unity, they should have found a better way. Although I have NO PROBLEM with locking arms as a show of unity, it has also became tainted.

Kneeling now against the Anthem is NOT a protest against its original intentions, but more towards a protest of "I DON"T LIKE WHAT YOU SAID"


First of all, if you can't see the difference between an independent citizen expressing their opinion and the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES saying players should be fired for exercising free speech there's no real point in continuing. The NFL shares a special relationship with the US Gov't, making it especially susceptible to its whims and fancies. The leader of said government pressuring them on policy and calling their players "sons of bitches" is therefore especially egregious. Regardless, even if we pretend for a moment that it's not any different for him to say that than anyone else... how is it remotely relevant? You literally go on multiple tirades about how freedom of speech isn't freedom from outrage, and then in the same breath get all riled up that people are outraged at what the president said and demonstrating that via their own freedom of speech. Sorry, but that sword cuts both ways. I could honestly just copy and paste your own arguments in rebuttal and save myself a lot of time here.

Booger926 wrote:

Johnny Manziel also isn't in the league because he's a middling back-up quality QB who happened to have a better record than Colin. And I will leave it at that. Difference is as noticeable as being Black and White.


Seriously... Manziel is the example you want to lean on? The drug addict who keeps dropping out of rehab, who never once demonstrated any NFL level ability while in the league? And how is record in any way relevant? The Bears went to the SB with Rex Grossman. I guess that makes him better than Rivers, right?

Booger926 wrote:
Free speech is a right and that right especially includes the right to offend. Without the right to offend you have no free speech rights.

There is no right to be protected from hurt feelings or offense. Nothing in the constitution or bill of rights guarantees that you can go through life without getting your feelings hurt or being offended and nothing requires the government to protect you from hurt feelings. The constitution DOES specifically guarantee you the right to speak freely and it is the government's obligation to protect that right.


Okay, so... what's your point exactly? Are the players linking arms to promote their bill in congress to put a gag order on the president? Seriously, this is a complete non-sequitur. Not to mention pretty **** rich coming from someone who has now made multiple posts expressing their outrage at an act of free speech, and pounding the gavel for the NFL to punish players for doing so.

Booger926 wrote:


In an organization that is 78% African American, HOW CAN YOU EVEN DARE BRINGING RACE INTO THE EQUATION?????

Gee, maybe one should sue the NFL because they don't meet National Guidelines of equal opportunity.

Just my "White Privilege" speaking out against percieved Racial Injustice.

When one has to pass a law saying 17% of the US population should have equal opportunity, why did there even have to be a law. One should be based on what they bring to the table instead of the color of their skin.


Care to reply?


Oh, sorry, I didn't realize you personally hired those players, therefore making you immune from having racially motivated beliefs. This is becoming a bit of a mantra for me, but... seriously, what is your point here? You watch a league with black players in it, so therefore your outrage at players kneeling isn't racially motivated? You clearly just want to segue this into another one of your persecution complexes. And really, you're saying that there was ZERO need for laws to ensure equal opportunity? Really? In a country where there are literally people still living who weren't allowed to go to integrated public schools, pools, restaurants, drinking fountains... no, you're right, we definitely should have just maintained our perfectly functioning meritocracy instead.

Re: NFL BullShiite

By Booger926
9/30/2017 5:48 pm
Ares wrote:
Booger926 wrote:

Dear Sir;
Although I respect your opinion, I wish you would respect mine.


You literally finish this by calling me a racist, so please, continue to self-righteously (and erroneously) claim the moral high ground.

Booger926 wrote:

Colin Kaepernick began the protest to bring attention to police brutality against Blacks. However, after opting out of a contract, by his choice mind you, and not being picked up by any team as a free agent, Colin then stated that he would now stand for the Anthem. Let me ask you this....Other than being unemployed, what has changed in 1 year? Basically, Kaepernick is a ***** chasing the money.

The current protests are in response to our elected President's opinions, which is also guaranteed under the right of Freedom of Speech. If the players / league wanted show unity, they should have found a better way. Although I have NO PROBLEM with locking arms as a show of unity, it has also became tainted.

Kneeling now against the Anthem is NOT a protest against its original intentions, but more towards a protest of "I DON"T LIKE WHAT YOU SAID"


First of all, if you can't see the difference between an independent citizen expressing their opinion and the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES saying players should be fired for exercising free speech there's no real point in continuing. The NFL shares a special relationship with the US Gov't, making it especially susceptible to its whims and fancies. The leader of said government pressuring them on policy and calling their players "sons of bitches" is therefore especially egregious. Regardless, even if we pretend for a moment that it's not any different for him to say that than anyone else... how is it remotely relevant? You literally go on multiple tirades about how freedom of speech isn't freedom from outrage, and then in the same breath get all riled up that people are outraged at what the president said and demonstrating that via their own freedom of speech. Sorry, but that sword cuts both ways. I could honestly just copy and paste your own arguments in rebuttal and save myself a lot of time here.

Booger926 wrote:

Johnny Manziel also isn't in the league because he's a middling back-up quality QB who happened to have a better record than Colin. And I will leave it at that. Difference is as noticeable as being Black and White.


Seriously... Manziel is the example you want to lean on? The drug addict who keeps dropping out of rehab, who never once demonstrated any NFL level ability while in the league? And how is record in any way relevant? The Bears went to the SB with Rex Grossman. I guess that makes him better than Rivers, right?

Booger926 wrote:
Free speech is a right and that right especially includes the right to offend. Without the right to offend you have no free speech rights.

There is no right to be protected from hurt feelings or offense. Nothing in the constitution or bill of rights guarantees that you can go through life without getting your feelings hurt or being offended and nothing requires the government to protect you from hurt feelings. The constitution DOES specifically guarantee you the right to speak freely and it is the government's obligation to protect that right.


Okay, so... what's your point exactly? Are the players linking arms to promote their bill in congress to put a gag order on the president? Seriously, this is a complete non-sequitur. Not to mention pretty **** rich coming from someone who has now made multiple posts expressing their outrage at an act of free speech, and pounding the gavel for the NFL to punish players for doing so.

Booger926 wrote:


In an organization that is 78% African American, HOW CAN YOU EVEN DARE BRINGING RACE INTO THE EQUATION?????

Gee, maybe one should sue the NFL because they don't meet National Guidelines of equal opportunity.

Just my "White Privilege" speaking out against percieved Racial Injustice.

When one has to pass a law saying 17% of the US population should have equal opportunity, why did there even have to be a law. One should be based on what they bring to the table instead of the color of their skin.


Care to reply?


Oh, sorry, I didn't realize you personally hired those players, therefore making you immune from having racially motivated beliefs. This is becoming a bit of a mantra for me, but... seriously, what is your point here? You watch a league with black players in it, so therefore your outrage at players kneeling isn't racially motivated? You clearly just want to segue this into another one of your persecution complexes. And really, you're saying that there was ZERO need for laws to ensure equal opportunity? Really? In a country where there are literally people still living who weren't allowed to go to integrated public schools, pools, restaurants, drinking fountains... no, you're right, we definitely should have just maintained our perfectly functioning meritocracy instead.


First of all, Sir, you have expressed your opinion, which I disagree against.
I have expressed my opinion, which you disagree against.

That is the benefit of FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
When you cannot even see that, then you have lost all meaning to the right.

I have NEVER said that I disrespected the protested means, only that I do not approve of them. One has the right to peacefully protest, but not the right from consequences from their protest. It's an act of responsibility

And second, I was not the one who first threw down the "Race" card. That, Sir, is all you. Because you played it only shows how racist you really are.......
Oh I forgot.....Black People cannot be Racist

I now play the Bullshite card



Last edited at 9/30/2017 9:17 pm

Re: NFL BullShiite

By Booger926
9/30/2017 9:35 pm
Sir
I will never apologize for having my own opinion.
I will never apologize for speaking out against injustice
And you sure as **** can guarantee That I will NEVER EVER apologize for being born Caucasian

If your racist **** has a problem with that, then maybe you should question your own dumb A$$



Re: NFL BullShiite

By Booger926
9/30/2017 9:52 pm
Ares wrote:
First of all, if you can't see the difference between an independent citizen expressing their opinion and the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES saying players should be fired for exercising free speech there's no real point in continuing. The NFL shares a special relationship with the US Gov't, making it especially susceptible to its whims and fancies. The leader of said government pressuring them on policy and calling their players "sons of bitches" is therefore especially egregious. Regardless, even if we pretend for a moment that it's not any different for him to say that than anyone else... how is it remotely relevant? You literally go on multiple tirades about how freedom of speech isn't freedom from outrage, and then in the same breath get all riled up that people are outraged at what the president said and demonstrating that via their own freedom of speech. .


This paragraph here is the most idiotic and most asinine post you have ever had.
So it is OK for employees of a company to express their First Amendment Rights, but the Leader and Protector of those rights CANNOT express his?

SMH at a effen clueless snowflake racist stupid hypocritical idiot.

Your check is in the mail since you even can't make an independent thought on your own.

Baaaaaa for me, sheeple
Last edited at 10/02/2017 6:14 pm